I guess BC should take example from German provinces tournament system, they have pyramid system having players with no ranking to start C tournament then go to B tournament and to A tournament, with making sure season starts with C tournament then B then A, its like a cycle.
And usually in a season they 2-3 cycle.
If u managed to went to B next cycle no need to play C anymore, etc.
But all of these only be possible if the clubs in BC are united and have the same goals, and the clubs really work together to help players from BC no matter what their level to become better players, and every players from every club have same chances.
I am not familiar with the German state system, but I disagree with your premise that all clubs in BC are united and have the same goals. Each club is independent and depending on whether they are private or non-for-profit, goals would depend on their business model. Some choose to have more competitive junior programs, and some take a recreational approach. Some are based on membership and community activities, and though I would agree on the most part that they should help people become better at badminton, some people might simply just want to play for fun.
The pyramid system you mention would be something that Badminton BC decides on, as they are the provincial sport organization funded by the government to develop the sport. However, even how Badminton BC operates depends on many factors outside our control.
I would agree that every player from every club should have a chance to participate in competition, but how they perform is purely up to the players. Some want to improve, some want to have fun, some want to win. They might seem to have an equal chance of winning, but the actual probability of winning will likely differ.
Lastly, I should mention that BC is nearly three times the size of Germany (~950,000 km² vs. ~360,000 km²) but has 16 times fewer people (~5 million vs 84 million). That's not a very good comparison.
I guess BC should take example from German provinces tournament system, they have pyramid system having players with no ranking to start C tournament then go to B tournament and to A tournament, with making sure season starts with C tournament then B then A, its like a cycle.
And usually in a season they 2-3 cycle.
If u managed to went to B next cycle no need to play C anymore, etc.
But all of these only be possible if the clubs in BC are united and have the same goals, and the clubs really work together to help players from BC no matter what their level to become better players, and every players from every club have same chances.
I am not familiar with the German state system, but I disagree with your premise that all clubs in BC are united and have the same goals. Each club is independent and depending on whether they are private or non-for-profit, goals would depend on their business model. Some choose to have more competitive junior programs, and some take a recreational approach. Some are based on membership and community activities, and though I would agree on the most part that they should help people become better at badminton, some people might simply just want to play for fun.
The pyramid system you mention would be something that Badminton BC decides on, as they are the provincial sport organization funded by the government to develop the sport. However, even how Badminton BC operates depends on many factors outside our control.
I would agree that every player from every club should have a chance to participate in competition, but how they perform is purely up to the players. Some want to improve, some want to have fun, some want to win. They might seem to have an equal chance of winning, but the actual probability of winning will likely differ.
Lastly, I should mention that BC is nearly three times the size of Germany (~950,000 km² vs. ~360,000 km²) but has 16 times fewer people (~5 million vs 84 million). That's not a very good comparison.